• PHONE: +1(202) 952-1229
  • EMAIL: [email protected]
LIVE CHAT
Essaysglobe.com
  • HOME
  • ORDER NOW
  • LOGIN
  • Menu

Week 2: Assignment: Evidence Synthesis and Tables

March 2, 2022/in Uncategorized /by Davis

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to document sources of research evidence that support the evidence-based intervention for the selected practice problem, including the level and quality of each source of research evidence. A synthesis of the evidence is conducted to determine the overall strength and quality of the evidence. The development of an evidence table and synthesis are foundational to inform actions and decisions to improve healthcare outcomes. Construction of an evidence table and synthesis supports the professional formation of the DNP-prepared nurse.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcome.

  • CO 3: Develop strategies to lead project planning, implementation, management, and evaluation to promote high-value healthcare. (POs 3, 5, 7)

Due Date(s)

Submit your assignment by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 2. The late assignment policy applies to this assignment.

Instructions

Download the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool (Links to an external site.) and the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool (Links to an external site.) located in the Student Resource Center under “Project & Practicum Resources.”

As you incorporate published research study findings into your own writing, you aim for synthesis of the material. Before learning how to write a synthesis, it is important to define this term. At its most basic level, a synthesis involves combining two or more summaries. Synthesis writing is more difficult than it might first appear because this combining must be done in a meaningful way.

A synthesis requires critical reading and thinking in order to compare different material, highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. When a practice scholar synthesizes successfully, they present new ideas based on interpretations of published research evidence. Conceptually, it can be helpful to think about synthesis existing at both the local (or paragraph) level and the global (or paper) level.

Synthesis is all about collecting information from different sources and putting it together as one content.

Review the Graduate Re-Purpose Policy in the Student Handbook, page 15:

Repurposed Work (Chamberlain University Graduate Programs only): Graduate students have the opportunity to use previously submitted ideas as a foundation for future courses. No more than 50 percent of an assignment, excluding references, may be repurposed from another Chamberlain University course (excluding practicum courses). Previous course assignments that are deemed building blocks will be notated in the syllabus by the course leader. As with every assignment, students must uphold academic integrity; therefore, students must follow the guidelines for remaining academically honest according to the Academic Integrity policy. If the instructor is not made aware of the repurposing of an assignment, the submission will be treated as plagiarized work if not properly referenced

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of this assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

  1. Title Page
  2. Introduce the Practice Problem
    1. Practice Problem Statement
    2. Describe the Significance of the Practice Problem at the National Level (1 paragraph)
  3. Synthesis of Evidence to Support the Evidence-Based Intervention for the Selected Practice Problem. Include 3 Current LEVEL I, II, or III Peer-Reviewed Primary Research Studies and/or Systematic Reviews. May reuse research studies from previous courses.
    1. Synthesis of the Literature (2 paragraphs)
      1. Main Points/Salient Themes That Emerge from the Sources (Cited)
      2. Compare and Contrast Main Points /Themes from All Sources (Cited)
    2. Support for Evidence-Based Intervention (1 paragraph)
      1. Objective Rationale for the Intervention Based on the Literature
  4. Summary Table of Evidence to Address the Evidence-Based Intervention for the Selected Practice Problem Using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Evidence Summary Tool. Include as an appendix.
  5. Reference Page with Complete References for the 3 Sources of Research Evidence, Including the Permalink
  6. APA Formatting/ References
    1. APA Standards for Scholarly Papers
    2. Level I Headings are included

All Chamberlain University policies related to plagiarism must be observed.

Interactive with Feedback

Each week your course faculty will provide feedback in the rubric and on any assignment you have submitted. Take a moment to review the following video on how to view rubric feedback in Canvas:

  • Link (video): Making the Most of Feedback in Canvas (Links to an external site.) (2:26)

Review the following video on how to accept/reject track changes when viewing faculty feedback on your assignment:

  • Link (video): Word: Track Changes and Comments (4:19)

Rubric

Week 2 Assignment Grading Rubric: Evidence Synthesis and Tables (140 pts)
Week 2 Assignment Grading Rubric: Evidence Synthesis and Tables (140 pts)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice Problem

Requirements:
1. State the Practice Problem.
2. Describe the significance of the practice problem at the national level. (Cite all sources)

40 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance
Includes all data requirements and provides an in-depth discussion about the practice problem.

36 pts

Good or High Level of Performance
Includes at least 2 requirements and/or provides a sufficient discussion about the practice problem.

32 pts

Acceptable or basic Level of Performance
Includes at least 1 requirements and/or provides a partial discussion about the practice problem.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Provides an undeveloped discussion about the practice problem.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Synthesis to Support the Evidence-Based Intervention

Requirements:
1. State the Main themes in the findings that emerge from the sources (Cited).
2. Contrast the main points from the sources (Cited).
3. Present an objective rationale for the intervention based on the literature.

50 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth synthesis of research evidence supporting the evidence-based Intervention.

45 pts

Good or High Level of Performance
Includes at least 2 requirements and/or provides a sufficient synthesis of research evidence supporting the evidence-based Intervention.

40 pts

Acceptable or basic Level of Performance
Includes at least 1 requirements and/or provides a partial synthesis of research evidence supporting the evidence-based Intervention

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Provides an undeveloped synthesis of research evidence supporting the evidence-based Intervention.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeJohns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table

Requirements:
1. Enter the information for the Three Research Studies.
2. Complete all sections and identify the quality and the levels of evidence.

30 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance
Includes all requirements of the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table and provides an in-depth evidence table presentation.

27 pts

Good or High Level of Performance
Includes 2 requirements  of the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table and/or provides a sufficient evidence table presentation.

24 pts

Acceptable or basic Level of Performance
Includes 1 requirement of the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table and/or provides a partial evidence table presentation.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes less than all requirements of the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table and/or provides an underdeveloped evidence table presentation.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Standards

Requirements:
1. Uses appropriate Level I headers.
2. Reference Page with complete references including the 3 sources of research evidence including the Permalink.
3. Reference and citations are in current APA style

10 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance
Includes all requirements of APA style and standards.

9 pts

Good or High Level of Performance
Includes 2 requirements of APA style and standards.

8 pts

Acceptable or basic Level of Performance
Includes 1 requirements of APA style and standards.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates poor APA style and standards.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing

Requirements:
1. Uses standard English grammar and sentence structure.
2. No spelling or typographical errors.
3. Organized presentation of ideas.

10 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance
Includes all requirements of clarity of writing.

9 pts

Good or High Level of Performance
Includes 2 requirements of clarity of writing.

8 pts

Acceptable or basic Level of Performance
Includes 1 requirement of clarity of writing.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates poor clarity of writing.
10 pts
Total Points: 140
PreviousNext

"Get Help With Your Essay
. If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!

Order Now
https://essaysglobe.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/logo-EG.png 0 0 Davis https://essaysglobe.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/logo-EG.png Davis2022-03-02 13:47:252022-03-02 13:47:25Week 2: Assignment: Evidence Synthesis and Tables

Calculate your order cost

Total price (USD) $12.99

Continue to order

Week 2: Discussion: Organizational Assessment Week 3: Discussion: Introduction to Project Management
Scroll to top
essaysglobe.com
All of papers you get at Essaysglobe.com are meant for research purposes only. The papers are not supposed to be submitted for academic credit.
Privacy Policy
Email: [email protected] | Phone: +1(202) 952-1229
© 2022 Essaysglobe.com All rights reserved.