• PHONE: +1(202) 952-1229
  • EMAIL: [email protected]
LIVE CHAT
Essaysglobe.com
  • HOME
  • ORDER NOW
  • LOGIN
  • Menu

Week 4: Translation Science Project Guidelines

November 6, 2021/in Uncategorized /by Davis

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to develop a translation science project to support practice change. Evidence translation is essential to drive actions and decisions to improve healthcare outcomes. Formulation of a comprehensive translation science project supports the professional formation of the DNP scholar.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

  • CO1: Assess the impact of informatics and information technology on organizational systems, change, and improvement. (PO6)
  • CO2: Use information technology to collect and analyze data to generate evidence-based nursing practice across healthcare settings. (PO7)
  • CO3: Design programs that monitor and evaluate outcomes of care, care systems, and quality improvement. (PO7)

DUE DATE: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 4. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.

TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS: 250

PREPARING THE ASSIGNMENT:

In order to create flexible options, we are providing you options on your Week 4 Translation Science Project Assignment that focuses on your practice project idea. Concept maps are an effective way to express complex ideas, especially for visual learners. For this assignment, each of the following sections can be presented either as a narrative or as a concept map:

  • Practice Problem/PICOT Question
  • Evidence Synthesis of Literature to Address Practice Problem
  • Appraisal of the Evidence to Address Selected Problem
  • Translation Path

Please note that you are not required to complete any or all sections as a concept map. If you choose to use a concept map for a section, it should be created in Microsoft Word and placed in that section of your paper. The concept map must meet all the requirements of the assignment rubric for that section. The rubric and page length requirements of the paper are unchanged.

If you need additional information about concept maps and how to create a concept map in Microsoft Word, please access the resources below.

Microsoft Word: Creating a Flowchart, Concept, or Process Map 4:03 minutes

Microsoft Word: Creating a flowchart, concept map, or process map (Links to an external site.)Microsoft Word: Creating a flowchart, concept map, or process map

Concept Mapping for Developing Your Research 3:37 minutes

Concept Mapping for Developing your Research (Links to an external site.)Concept Mapping for Developing your Research

Research Article: Zori, S., & Morrison, B. (2009). Critical thinking in nurse managers. Nursing Economics, 27(2), 75-9, 98.

https://chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/docview/236937990?accountid=147674 (Links to an external site.)

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of this assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

  1. The assignment should be no less than 6 pages and no more than 8 pages (excluding title and reference pages and appended evidence tables).
  2. The assignment will include the following components:
    1. Title Page
    2. Introduction
      1. Purpose Statement
      2. Practice Problem Identification
      3. Role of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem.
      4. Role of the DNP Practice Scholar in Evidence Translation
    3. Practice Problem and Question (Narrative or Conceptual Map)
      1. Significance
      2. Prevalence
      3. Economic Ramifications
      4. Practice Problem Question in PICOT Format
    4. Evidence Synthesis of Literature to Address the Selected Practice Problem (Narrative or Conceptual Map)
      1. Scope of the Evidence Synthesis
      2. Main Points of Each Source
      3. Comparison of Main Points across Sources
    5. Appraisal of the Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem (Narrative or Conceptual Map)
      1. Level of Evidence
      2. Quality Rating of Evidence
      3. Suitability of the Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem
    6. Translation Path (Narrative or Conceptual Map)
      1. Potential Internal Factors for Consideration
      2. Potential External Factors for Consideration
      3. Selected Translation or Change Model
      4. Evaluation Plan
      5. Anticipated Outcomes
      6. Strategies for Sustainability
    7. Conclusion
      1. Summation of the Impact of the Practice Problem
      2. Role of the Appraisal of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem.
      3. Summation of the Role of the DNP Practice Scholar in Evidence Translation
    8. Summary Tables of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Evidence Summary Tool (Links to an external site.)
      1. Provides four sources of evidence to address the practice problem.
    9. APA Style and Organization
      1. APA Standards for Scholarly Papers
        • Level I Headings for the Following
          • Practice Problem and Question
          • Evidence Synthesis of Literature
          • Appraisal of the Evidence
          • Translation Path into Practice
          • Conclusion
          • References
          • Summary Tables of the Evidence
      2. Grammar and Mechanics
      3. Paper is 6-8 Pages (excluding Title and Reference Pages and appended Summary Tables)
      4. Uses Required Evidence Summary Table
  3. To complete this assignment, please begin your search from the Chamberlain library home page at https://library.chamberlain.edu/home (Links to an external site.). Search on your keywords using the Search Everything field. This search field access all the large library database collections.  Federal and other open access sources are not included in the search functions and must be searched individually. With questions, please email the librarians using the form on the Ask Us! linked page at the upper right of every library page https://library.chamberlain.edu/AskUs (Links to an external site.)

All Chamberlain University policies related to plagiarism must be observed. This written assignment will not be screened for originality by TurnItIn

Rubric

NR706 Week 4 Translation Science Project
NR706 Week 4 Translation Science Project
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

Requirements:
1. Includes a focused purpose statement.
2. Identifies selected practice problem in general terms.
3. Discusses the role of evidence to address the selected practice problem.
4. Identifies the role of the DNP practice scholar in evidence translation.

20 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 4 requirements

18 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

16 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes 1 or fewer requirements.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplications of the Practice Problem

Requirements:
1. Describes the significance of the practice problem.
2. Discusses the prevalence of the practice problem.
3. Discusses the economic ramifications of the practice problem.
4. States Practice Problem Question in PICOT Format.

40 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 4 requirements

36 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

32 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes 1 or fewer requirements.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Synthesis of Literature

Requirements:
1. Describes the scope of the evidence synthesis.
2. Discusses the main points of each source.
3. Compares main points across sources.

40 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

36 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements

32 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes no less than 1 requirement.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
No requirements for this section presented.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppraisal of the Evidence

Requirements:
1. Describes the levels of evidence.
2. Discusses the quality of evidence
3. Discusses the suitability of the evidence to address the practice problem.

40 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

36 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements

32 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes no less than 1 requirement.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
No requirements for this section presented.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTranslation Path

Requirements:
1. Identifies potential internal factors impacting the translation of evidence.
2. Identifies potential external factors impacting the translation of evidence.
3. Describes the selected translation/change model.
4. Describes an evaluation plan of the translation of evidence.
5. Discusses anticipated outcomes of the translation of evidence.
6. Describes strategies for sustainability.

40 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 6 requirements.

36 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 5 requirements

32 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 4 requirements.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes 3 or fewer requirements.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

Requirements:
1. Includes a summation of the impact of the practice problem.
2. Includes a summation of the appraisal of evidence.
3. Includes a summation of the role of the DNP practice scholar in evidence translation.

20 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

18 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements

16 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes no less than 1 requirement.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
No requirements for this section presented.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Summary Tool

Requirements:
1. Provides a complete summary of four sources of evidence.

30 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 4 requirements.

27 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

24 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes 1 or fewer requirements.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Organization

Requirements:
1. Uses APA Standards for Scholarly Papers. (APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors and no citations missing)
2. Uses Level I Headings for the following
• Practice Problem and Question
• Evidence Synthesis of Literature
• Appraisal of the Evidence
• Translation Path into Practice
• Conclusion
• References
• Summary Tables of the Evidence
3. Grammar and Mechanics are free of errors
4. Paper is 6-8 Pages (excluding Title and Reference Pages and appended Summary Tables)
5. Uses Required Evidence Summary Table

20 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 5 requirements

18 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 4 requirements

16 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes 2 or fewer requirements.
20 pts
Total Points: 250
PreviousNext

"Get Help With Your Essay
. If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!

Order Now
https://essaysglobe.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/logo-EG.png 0 0 Davis https://essaysglobe.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/logo-EG.png Davis2021-11-06 14:17:572021-11-06 14:17:57Week 4: Translation Science Project Guidelines

Calculate your order cost

Total price (USD) $12.99

Continue to order

Week 4: Translating Research into Practice Week 5: Patient Safety and a Culture of Safety
Scroll to top
essaysglobe.com
All of papers you get at Essaysglobe.com are meant for research purposes only. The papers are not supposed to be submitted for academic credit.
Privacy Policy
Email: support[email protected] | Phone: +1(202) 952-1229
© 2022 Essaysglobe.com All rights reserved.